Is Iran close to a nuclear bomb? An earthquake sparks question

An earthquake in an Iranian desert on October 5 sparked speculation that Iran had tested a nuclear bomb. Though there was no official word on the chatter, experts believe Iran is closer than ever to acquiring a nuclear weapon, amid tensions with Israel. This is the time, experts think, Iran might need to get nuclear weapons.

Iran's nuclear advancements have long raised concerns among global powers, especially the US and its Middle East ally Israel. (Photo: AFP)

Iran is an earthquake-prone country, but a quake on October 5 has started chatter about whether Iran conducted a nuclear test. The timing of the seismic activity and the location made people link it to Iran's nuclear programme and ask if the Islamic country was close to getting its own nuclear weapon. However, testing nuclear capabilities doesn't mean a country is within weeks of acquiring a functional nuclear weapon.

An earthquake, measuring 4.4 on the Richter scale, was recorded in Aradan County in Semnan Province at 10:45 am, Mehr News Agency reported. The earthquake struck at a depth of 12 km, it said, quoting the Institute of Geophysics of the University of Tehran.

Since then, a section of people have been insinuating that the quake was a result of Iran conducting a nuclear test.

Though there is no official confirmation or denial, some handles on X have also shared graphs, showing how the seismic activity corresponds to a temblor associated with nuclear tests. No expert has confirmed any of these.

The timing of the quake, a natural phenomenon, is such that it has given rise to these speculations.

On October 1, Iran fired around 180 ballistic missiles at Israel. It was its biggest direct attack on the Jewish nation.

Israel vowed revenge, and the world has been on tenterhooks ever since.

However, a question that is being asked: Is Iran close to getting a nuclear weapon?

"Iran can produce nuclear weapons far more rapidly than expected," said The Heritage Foundation on October 1.

It quoted a senior Iranian lawmaker saying that there was only a "one-week gap from the issuance of the order to the first test" of a nuclear bomb. That remark was made in April.

There is no doubt that Iran's nuclear programme is in advanced stages.

In an interview with The Guardian, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak said a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities might not be much of a setback as its programme was too far advanced.

The West has for decades accused Iran of pursuing a military nuclear programme in the garb of civilian nuclear projects.

In 2010, the Stuxnet malware was detected at Iran's biggest nuclear facility in Natanz.

It was reported that the US and Israel used Stuxnet to disable centrifuges, setting back Iran's nuclear programme by 5 years.

In 2015, Iran accepted restrictions on uranium enrichment -- crucial for nuclear weapons -- in lieu of easing of sanctions against it. That pact actually lasted for three years.

It was reported that Iran is closer than ever to reaching the 90% uranium enrichment grade that is required to manufacture a nuclear bomb, The Heritage Foundation report, citing International Atomic Energy Agency official, said in October 2024.

So, if Iran does lay its hands on weapons-grade uranium and conducts a nuclear test, how far is it from a functional nuclear weapon?

"... Iran is a de facto threshold country. They do not have a weapon yet – but it may take them a year to have one, and even half a decade to have a small arsenal,” former Israeli PM Ehud Barak told The Guardian in the October 4 interview.

The New York Times in a report on October 2 said it wasn't a matter of weeks but could take months or even a year for Iran to make a nuclear weapon. "It takes advanced metallurgy and engineering to make a nuclear weapon," it said.

An electronic firing system would be needed to make explosives, which can compress a nuclear core and start a chain reaction that emits nuclear energy. The warhead then must be tested time and again to ensure it can bear extremely high levels of heat, the NYT explained.

Then explosive testing would be required to ensure the warhead detonates at the expected time, it added.

"I don’t think there’s a danger that Iran this year is going to start exploding nuclear weapons,” Houston G Wood, an emeritus professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the University of Virginia, told The New York Times.

Though experts are suggesting that Iran might be months away from a nuclear weapon, this is also the closest it has ever been to one. This could also be the reason why Israel has gone slow with its counterattack despite a huge provocation by Iran. Israel is an undeclared nuclear power, and Iran getting nuclear weapons of its own would place the Middle East on a nuclear powder keg, given the crisis in the region.